The brain makes substantial progress in reversing tolerance-induced de-sensitivities within
72 hours of ending all nicotine use. Withdrawal anxieties will peak, begin to diminish and
the worst will be behind you.
But although the brain gradually restores natural sensitivities, somehow tolerance’s wiring
paths become permanently etched into our brains.
Although we can arrest our chemical
dependency, we cannot cure, permanently eliminate or destroy it. We each remain wired
for relapse for life. It’s why nicotine dependency recovery is an all or nothing proposition.
Just one powerful puff, dip or chew of nicotine and we will find our brain again begging
for more. While this may seem like a curse it gradually becomes our biggest peace of
mind. Once confident of victory, we know exactly what it takes to stay free.
Whether the brain’s current daily level of tolerance is one nicotine fix or twenty does not
alter its status as slave. cigarettes news.
The Online Cigarette sites by giving you the best in terms of cigarettes and you will no longer have to worry that you spent just about too much on cigarettes. Best smoking news online.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Anti-Smoking Group Cherry-Picking Studies to Mislead Pubic About the Science
As a former Board member of Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights (ANR), I can attest to the fact that as an organization, we used to attack the tobacco companies for cherry-picking studies that supported their claims, hiding key information from the public to make it appear that there was no evidence to show that secondhand smoke is harmful.
For example, the tobacco companies would point to one study which failed to find a connection between secondhand smoke and heart disease, while ignoring all the rest of the studies.
For example, the tobacco companies would point to one study which failed to find a connection between secondhand smoke and heart disease, while ignoring all the rest of the studies.
Tobacco and Pharma players have begun to sit up and take notice
Today, I am happy to opine that despite the best efforts of these anti-smoking organizations, electronic cigarettes are here to stay. The FDA failed in its efforts because the courts ruled that its jurisdiction over these products falls under the Tobacco Act, not the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (in the absence of therapeutic or drug claims made by electronic cigarette companies).
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Chicago, Cook County Mull Cigarette Tax Hikes
Faced with a $298-million budget deficit, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel has pledged not to raise taxes on homes, gasoline or retail purchases. However, he has not ruled out a cigarette tax hike for the city, according to a report from Medill News Service.
Chicago already has the second-highest cigarette taxes in the country, second only to New York City. As of June, the average total cost of a pack of cigarettes in Illinois was $10.25, cheaper than only New York’s $12.50 per pack.
RJR Sues E-Cig Maker
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. has filed a lawsuit against electronic cigarette maker SAS Technologies, accusing the company of infringing on its Camel cigarette and Winston cigarettes , reported The Business Journal.
The lawsuit was filed last week in U.S. District Court in North Carolina by Reynolds
Innovations Inc., a subsidiary of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., producer of Camel cigarettes which is itself part of Reynolds American Inc.
Reynolds Innovations claims that SaveASmoker.com is selling "E-Liquid" products with names such as "Camell Tobacco" and "Winston" among the different flavors of liquid nicotine products, the report said.
According to the lawsuit, Reynolds Innovations believes that the use of the Camel and Winston names and images "is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception among consumers as to the source, origin or sponsorship of such products."
Monday, November 19, 2012
Eating certain types of processed food is just as dangerous as smoking processed cigarettes
Remember: Cigarettes are essentially processed smokes in the same way that the packaged factory-made food items at the grocery store are processed foods. In fact, some processed foods contain just as many chemical additives as processed cigarettes, yet people don't even think twice about gobbling down a sandwich made from processed bread and extremely toxic processed deli meat made with known cancer-causing chemicals.
So why don't you see the FDA releasing graphic labels that have to be placed on bacon, sausage, hot dogs and other processed meats that promote cancer? Because the FDA and the American medical establishment has declared war on tobacco while completely ignoring the health risks associated with toxic chemical additives in the food supply.
Chemotherapy is far more toxic than smoking cigarettes
Smoking toxic chemicals is about as idiotic as injecting them, and yet an entire medical industry now exists around the idea of injecting far deadlier chemicals than what you'll find in cigarette smoke. It's called chemotherapy, and it will kill you even faster than smoking an entire case of cigarettes a day.
Notice that the FDA does not require graphic warnings about chemotherapy? People vomiting, their muscles wasting away, their hair falling out and eyes looking hollow... that's the true face of chemo, and those who undergo it and somehow manage to come out alive are actually "chemo survivors" more than "cancer survivors." So why aren't there graphic warnings about chemotherapy?
Thursday, November 15, 2012
50% hike in cigarette rates would avoid 40 lakh deaths in India
Increasing the cigarette prices by 50 per cent would help avoid over 40
lakh tobacco related deaths in India, said a report released by
multilateral funding agency Asian Development Bank (ADB).
“A 50 per cent price increase in cigarettes avoids about 27 million (or
2.70 crore) tobacco-attributable deaths, most of which are in the two
most populous countries in the world.
China would avoid nearly 20 million tobacco deaths, and India over 4 million tobacco deaths,” said the report.
For India, it said, the 50 per cent rise in cigarette prices corresponds to increase of 70-122 per cent rise in tax increase.
Are Electronic Cigarettes Harmful?
Electronic cigarettes, which are sometimes referred to as smokeless cigarettes, are battery-powered devices that use heat or ultrasonics to vaporize a solution of nicotine in propylene glycol. While some of the manufacturers, have been advertising these as a healthier alternative to the conventional tobacco cigarettes, some refer these cigarettes to be a smoking cessation device.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)