The brain makes substantial progress in reversing tolerance-induced de-sensitivities within
72 hours of ending all nicotine use. Withdrawal anxieties will peak, begin to diminish and
the worst will be behind you.
But although the brain gradually restores natural sensitivities, somehow tolerance’s wiring
paths become permanently etched into our brains.
Although we can arrest our chemical
dependency, we cannot cure, permanently eliminate or destroy it. We each remain wired
for relapse for life. It’s why nicotine dependency recovery is an all or nothing proposition.
Just one powerful puff, dip or chew of nicotine and we will find our brain again begging
for more. While this may seem like a curse it gradually becomes our biggest peace of
mind. Once confident of victory, we know exactly what it takes to stay free.
Whether the brain’s current daily level of tolerance is one nicotine fix or twenty does not
alter its status as slave. cigarettes news.
The Online Cigarette sites by giving you the best in terms of cigarettes and you will no longer have to worry that you spent just about too much on cigarettes. Best smoking news online.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Anti-Smoking Group Cherry-Picking Studies to Mislead Pubic About the Science
As a former Board member of Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights (ANR), I can attest to the fact that as an organization, we used to attack the tobacco companies for cherry-picking studies that supported their claims, hiding key information from the public to make it appear that there was no evidence to show that secondhand smoke is harmful.
For example, the tobacco companies would point to one study which failed to find a connection between secondhand smoke and heart disease, while ignoring all the rest of the studies.
For example, the tobacco companies would point to one study which failed to find a connection between secondhand smoke and heart disease, while ignoring all the rest of the studies.
Tobacco and Pharma players have begun to sit up and take notice
Today, I am happy to opine that despite the best efforts of these anti-smoking organizations, electronic cigarettes are here to stay. The FDA failed in its efforts because the courts ruled that its jurisdiction over these products falls under the Tobacco Act, not the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (in the absence of therapeutic or drug claims made by electronic cigarette companies).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)